Key Differences Between Native Apps and Hybrid Apps

We are officially in the digital age and to put this in a different perspective we are on the app planet. Apps power a large number of technology-driven tasks and solutions. Customer-facing apps and business-facing apps have transformed the ecosystem, driving convenience and efficiency.

At the margins of the entire app development landscape, there have been discussions about the excellence and disadvantages of two types of app. Comparison of native app vs hybrid app has generated a lot of interest. Let us look at the main differences that are important.

Basic Difference Overview

A native app is an app that is specifically designed to work within a specific platform / for specific devices. There are two main platforms for devices – Android OS and iOS.

A native app is one that is designed to work exclusively within either Android OS or iOS. To look a little deeper, it basically means that a native app is built using languages ​​designed to work on specific devices.

For example, an apple device works on iOS, and the programming languages ​​that work with iOS are Swift and Objective-C. Similarly, for Android OS, the supporting languages ​​are Java and Kotlin.

Here is a View of Every Application

Native App

  • Native app UI is originally –
  • The app’s UX is native to the device
  • The app leverages the device’s special features
  • It offers developers a software development package, also called SDK
  • Extensive support with access to unique libraries
  • Mobile games built as native apps work better
  • Native apps are faster and efficient

Hybrid App

  • Technically, this is a web app built to work in a native environment
  • Hybrid apps are cross-platform
  • Relatively cheaper to build
  • Built with a web development technology stack
  • As hybrid apps are more like websites, an internet connection is required
  • Hybrid apps are relatively slower
  • Easier to develop hybrid apps

Key Differences

Native Apps

Hybrid Apps

Native app interface is functionally rich and appealing

Relatively sub-bar interface, mainly due to the need to use web technology

Performance is faster in native apps and on a comparable scale they are more reliable

Hybrid apps, although fast enough, score less when compared to native apps in terms of performance and speed

High access to native APIs

Relatively less access to remote APIs

Updating requires the entire app to be updated and the codes are usually updated from the market.

Updates do not cover the entire app, and are available from app stores, with updated app codes in several sources

Native apps by being designed for the device are more compatible with other apps that reside on the device

Although many hybrid apps are now compatible with other apps on the device, it is still relatively smaller in compatibility with other apps on the device

Extensive libraries and plugins give it a rich support system for developers

This is limited to developer solutions and plugins that are developed by the community

The OS provides the frameworks

The frameworks typically include – PhoneGap Rubymotion and Sencha Touch (HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Ruby)

Takes a lot of time for developers to learn development skills for the platform.

Takes less time for developers to learn skills. The main difference is that developers don’t need to learn about development for specific platforms, they just need to master the frameworks that will help them create cross-platform apps.

Time to market takes anywhere up to six months

The time to market is relatively less, and depending on the nature of the app, it can be finished in less than six months.

Development costs are higher for native apps

Development costs are relatively less for hybrid apps

The need for an internet connection for the apps to work depends on the app itself. It is mainly needed during updates and in API client apps

This usually requires an internet connection most of the time, compared to native apps

Usage-wise, the statistics are in favor of hybrid apps as this gives companies better reach and helps them reach out to more customers. However, for specialized applications, which require the apps to leverage built-in features of devices such as accelerometers, for example, native apps are the best choice.

In terms of usage between client facing apps and business facing apps, native apps are business facing apps in general, as the companies will find it easier to integrate the actions. However, this is not the rule, as companies are also known to use hybrid apps for business-facing applications. As far as client-facing applications are concerned, then device agnostic apps are the choice.

That is, businesses will find it convenient to use hybrid apps to meet the expectations of clients who may not stick to a particular device.

In terms of games, the device features and functions need to be fully exploited. That is, developing mobile games natively is ideal. However, the benefits of developing mobile games taking the hybrid route as the minimal time taken to develop and upgrade, will allow developers to focus more on other features and increase the user experience.

User experience – the key to app success

User experience is the key to app development. The whole development exercise is to make the applications more efficient, with fast performance. Regardless of the type of app being developed, ie, native or hybrid, it is essential to make the user experience better.

If users can use an app without any complications, then it doesn’t matter whether the app is hybrid or native. The jury is out as far as the comparison between native and hybrid apps is concerned, and it may be difficult to conclude, given the particular advantages and use cases.

Author: gerarguak

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *